<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: What&#8217;s Wrong With Wikipedia in Education?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wikimedia.org.uk/2014/06/whats-wrong-with-wikipedia-in-education/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wikimedia.org.uk/2014/06/whats-wrong-with-wikipedia-in-education/</link>
	<description>Open access to knowledge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 10:48:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hannah Jones		</title>
		<link>https://wikimedia.org.uk/2014/06/whats-wrong-with-wikipedia-in-education/#comment-451</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hannah Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 10:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/?p=2466#comment-451</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That is an interesting observation, Paul. Many thanks for your comment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is an interesting observation, Paul. Many thanks for your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: paul martin		</title>
		<link>https://wikimedia.org.uk/2014/06/whats-wrong-with-wikipedia-in-education/#comment-450</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[paul martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2014 02:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/?p=2466#comment-450</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I found that Turnitin and Wikipedia suffered the same disadvantage of students being poorly taught how to interpret them. The former was mainly a chore taking up inordinate amounts of precious marking time as the ins and outs of various pieces of copied and pasted prose were analysed, often derived from the latter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found that Turnitin and Wikipedia suffered the same disadvantage of students being poorly taught how to interpret them. The former was mainly a chore taking up inordinate amounts of precious marking time as the ins and outs of various pieces of copied and pasted prose were analysed, often derived from the latter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
