Thank you seem to be the hardest words

Image shows an arrangement of different coloured letters spelling the phrase
Why does “thank you” seem so difficult to say?

This post was written by Jon Davies, Wikimedia UK Chief Executive

A few months ago I wrote a critical review about a hotel I stayed in for Trip Advisor. I wanted to share my experience and warn off others. I posted and thought no more of it. I was surprised a few weeks later to receive a ‘Thank you’ email explaining how important by little piece of bile had been, and how many people had read it. I was chuffed. A month after that, and a couple more reviews, I was thanked again, given an update on the surprisingly large number of people who had read the reviews, and was awarded the equivalent of a ‘gold star’.

OK, so it was a bot but it occurred to me how sad it was that we don’t do something similar for our contributors. Barnstars are great but from what I observe many people never look at their user pages. Wouldn’t it be great if every time one of my uploaded photos made it onto a page I got some sort of alert or just a ‘thank you’ for every twentieth edit?

When I started working for Wikimedia UK I was warned that I was entering a culture that didn’t ‘do thank yous’. I think that we are missing out here and if we want to encourage and retain editors a few words of thanks from time to time would be a powerful tool.

Crowdsourcing: the wiki way of working

Image shows the logos of various Wikimedia projects

This post was written by Dr Martin Poulter, Jisc Wikimedia Ambassador

To influence education institutions, we need to speak their language and we need to put information in the places where they are looking for it.

The Jisc infoKits are online booklets for management, technologists and other staff in Higher and Further Education. This is where such people come for advice about Programme Management, Learning Spaces, Cloud Computing and many other topics. Today there is a new infoKit that I’ve written as part of the Jisc/Wikimedia UK partnership. “Crowdsourcing: the wiki way of working” shows how professionals and volunteers can collaborate to produce reference materials for education and research.

Like all infoKits, “Crowdsourcing” can be read from beginning to end or dipped into for short, self-contained examples and case studies. It culminates in a discussion of how collections of photographs and other digital media can benefit from sharing on Wikimedia Commons. Each section ends with a succinct summary of the lesson learned.
Continue reading “Crowdsourcing: the wiki way of working”

Royal Society to host Wikipedia events

The photo shows several women listening to a talk while another woman takes a photograph
Some attendees at last year’s event

This post was written by John Byrne, Wikimedian in Residence at the Royal Society

I’m now a month and a half into my six months as Wikmedian-in-residence at the Royal Society, the United Kingdom’s National Academy of Science, though as the role is supposed to be one day a week only, that in theory amounts to less than two working weeks.  In practice I’ve been much busier than that.

So far everything I’ve done has been internal to the Royal Society staff and parts of their wider scientific community, but on Tuesday March 4th we are having the first public event with an editathon celebrating (slightly in advance) International Women’s Day.   We’re trying what I think is a somewhat novel structure, with the room booked between 2 and 9 pm, and places booked for the afternoon or evening, but with fewer available for the evening so that if some afternoon people want to stay on they can.  If lots of people want to stay it could get interesting!   Apart from the training presentations, we are fortunate that Dame Athene Donald, FRS, Professor of Experimental Physics at Cambridge will be with us for a while in the afternoon and will introduce the afternoon session with a short talk on diversity in science, and the work the Royal Society is doing in this area. She also serves on the University of Cambridge Council and is their Gender Equality Champion. Both sessions will have a short tutorial presentation on editing followed by getting stuck in.  See the piece in last weekend’s Observer.

All 36 places have now gone, but people can join the waiting list (currently empty) as we may have cancellations. Of course online participants will be very welcome – see the event page on Wikipedia here.   The next public event will be on Tuesday March 25th, an editathon on the broad theme of diversity in science in gender, culture and geography.  That is planned to have the same structure, as adjusted by the lessons of March 4th.  There are also other events the week of International Women’s Day offering basic editing training, including the Women Archaeologists editing event at the Petrie Museum and the Women’s Arts Practices editing event at Women’s Art Library, Goldsmiths, on the day itself, Saturday March 8th —   see the Wikimedia UK events page.

The March 4th event is held in collaboration with the Royal Academy of Engineering, two doors down in Carlton House Terrace, who have been making a big push in the media recently about the need for more women to enter engineering.  The Royal Society held very successful editathons for Ada Lovelace Day in 2012 and again in 2013, which was my first own real introduction to the Royal Society, as one of the trainer team.

In January I gave a series of customized presentations for the Royal Society staff.  We had decided to offer training to the three most immediately relevant departments: the Library, Policy and Publications departments.  The training took the form of a two-part presentation, with two sessions of 90 minutes each, a week or two apart. The first session was without laptops for the participants, and had a quick overview of Wikimedia and Wikipedia, followed by an “under the bonnet” section showing the different namespaces, page histories, and discussing how Wikipedia works in practice, with a look at links in from the Royal Society websites, and other issues of special relevance.

The second session was hands-on editing practice, concentrating on basic techniques using a list of articles with issues.  Many thanks to User:Serendipodous (twice) and Jonathan Cardy who came in to help with the editing sessions.  January was largely taken up with these sessions, and at the moment we are not planning further ones, though I would like to offer a version to other Royal Society stakeholders/audiences in the future.

Apart from that I had a series of meetings with several departments, planning what else we might accomplish in the 6 month period. I had already come in for a planning meeting in November, so we had the bones of an events plan already, including slots at various sorts of RS events already in the calendar. I can’t announce many of the things we are hoping to do just yet, but I’m very positive about the project. One of the fascinating things about the RS is the very wide range of audiences or stakeholders they have, everybody from school students to Fellows of the RS and government. I’m especially keen to engage with their early and mid-career researcher audiences, and February and March events include three with the Royal Society Research Fellows, early-career researchers who receive grants from the Royal Society.

Preparing for the Wikimedia Serbia EduWiki Conference

Wikimedia Serbia (WMRS) is organising an EduWiki Conference which will be held in Belgrade on Monday 24 March 2013. A Learning Day, a meeting between members of the WMRS education project and Wikimedians from other chapters will also take place on Sunday 23 March, the day before the conference.

Brian Kelly will attend the conference and the learning day and will report on educational developments taking place in the UK. In this guest blog post Brian describes his involvement with Wikimedia, how it relates to his work as Innovation Advocate at Cetis, University of Bolton and his suggestions for enhancing the work of Wikimedia UK. Brian also invites feedback on related educational use of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia services taking place within the UK.


Background

About Myself

In December 1992 I saw a demonstration of the World Wide Web for the first time. Convinced of its importance, in January 1993 myself and colleagues at the University of Leeds set up a Web server for the University, the first institutional Web service in the UK. At that time Gopher was growing in popularity as a freely available tool which could be used for providing information services and its simplicity helped its appeal. However I felt that the Web, even at a time before inline images were available, had the potential to be of strategic importance to higher education and delivered a series of talks and seminars about the Web across the UK.

In 1996 I began work in a new post as UK Web Focus, an advisory role based at UKOLN, a national centre of expertise in digital information management located at the University of Bath. That position enabled me to continue in my advocacy work, promoting the benefits of the Web for the higher and further education sectors. After over 16 years in UKOLN in November 2013 I began work at Cetis, the Centre of Education Technology, Innovation and Standards based at the University of Bolton. As Innovation Advocate at Cetis I will be continuing my work in promoting the benefits of innovative technologies and practices. An area of particular importance is open education and open educational practices (OEP). This is an area in which I feel that Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects will have a role to play. Continue reading “Preparing for the Wikimedia Serbia EduWiki Conference”

Invitation to tender – Train the Trainers 2014

The photo shows a group of around fifteen people facing the camera
One of the groups of trainees from the programme

Wikimedia UK is the Wikimedia chapter covering the United Kingdom. We exist to help collect, develop and distribute freely licensed knowledge and other educational, cultural and historic material. We do this by bringing together the Wikimedia community in the UK, and by building links with UK-based cultural institutions, universities, charities and other bodies. We also represent UK-based Wikimedians to the Wikimedia Foundation and the global Wikimedia movement.

Wikimedia UK is seeking individuals or organisations to deliver our ‘Train the Trainers’ programme­ over the next two years.

The aim is to train active Wikipedians and educators to deliver consistent and high quality training to a range of audiences throughout the UK. These audiences will include volunteers hoping to edit for the first time, passing on new techniques to experienced Wikipedians as well as archivists and museum curators who will be working with users and editors of Wikipedia and all points in between.

If you would be interested in delivering this programme in cooperation with Wikimedia UK please send your tender to jon.davies@wikimedia.org.uk. It must include:

  • Details about yourself and your organisation including references that can be taken up regarding work of a similar nature you have undertaken in the past.
  • Examples of similar work you have undertaken in the past.
  • An explanation of your approach to working with volunteers.
  • A detailed description of the approach you will take with a timetable and success criteria. This should include teaching and assessment methods, and using the web to reinforce and extend learning.
  • The number of Wikimedians (i.e. those who regularly edit and contribute to the pages of our websites) you would be able to train.
  • How your work fits in with the open access ethos of Wikimedia UK.
  • An agreement that the training materials produced will be open access under a CC-BY-SA licence.
  • A detailed list of your tender amount and what it does and does not include.

The closing date for applications is Monday 7th April 17.00 hours UK time.

One sentence on Wikipedia: a microcosm of information literacy

Image shows a black and white icon often used to illustrate atoms
An “atomic approach” to Wikipedia can be useful

This post was written by Dr Martin Poulter, Jisc Wikimedia Ambassador

What are the building blocks or “atoms” of Wikipedia? A Wikipedia article can have many elements, but at its core is it built of originally-worded statements of fact with a citation to a reliable, published source which is independent of the thing written about. When a contribution is removed, it has usually broken at least part of this definition.

Taking each part of this definition, and asking “why?”, is a way to structure a discussion about the reliability of information found online. This briefing gives some examples of “why” questions that can emerge (or be elicited) and some pointers for discussion that will illuminate each point.

This could be used with a very wide variety of learners, depending on how you frame the discussion and on your examples. The discussion could be directed to focus on critical thinking, understanding of digital resources, knowledge of a specific subject, or even abstract questions about the nature of knowledge. Continue reading “One sentence on Wikipedia: a microcosm of information literacy”

Wikimedia UK strategy consultation – two weeks remaining!

Wikimedia UK is continuing to consult Wikimedians on the charity’s strategic planning for 2014-19. There are some key components of this work that would benefit from a wider input. These include the Strategic Plan, the model we have used, our Vision and Values and our five high-level Strategic Goals.

There are a few things we’re especially keen to hear from you about, including:

  • Does our planning represent the full range of activities we engage in, and their aims towards our mission?
  • Does it indicate how, and why, measurement will take place
  • Are the measures appropriate (aligned with our aims) and achievable (things we can actually measure)?
  • Do you have ideas of other measurements, or tools we might use to measure, our impact?
  • Are the targets given here ambitious, achievable, and trackable?
  • Which Outcome Measures we should be using against which to measure our impact, and also what targets we should aim to meet by the end of January 2015.
  • Given we will be associating our activities – including volunteer led activities – with the aims and measures given, are you happy the strategy represents a structure you can work with as a member of our community?

These plans are important because they establish a framework for our work over the next five years and present ways for us to measure the success of our activities.

The community consultation period is open until 28 February 2014 so please do have your say before then.

Interested in helping improve OpenStreetMap?

Image shows the OpenStreetMap logo of a magnifying glass over a map
The OpenStreetMap logo

Our friends at OpenStreetMap are working to collaboratively create a global, openly licensed map that’s free for everyone to use. They are always keen for more people to participate in their work and many Wikimedians are among the contributors.

OpenStreetMap is hosting a “hack weekend” on 8 & 9 March for volunteers to get together and focus on some technical work to improve the tool. This may be development of the “core” components, the editors, or any other side projects. There’s work to do in almost any programming language, as well as tasks like documentation, and even some non-technical graphics design and translation tasks.

If this sounds of interest to you, take a look at the full details of the event, including details of how to sign up, here.

*This post includes text from the event page by OpenStreetMap contributors, CC-BY-SA 2.0

Wikipedia training at the Royal Society of Chemistry

This photo shows the front of the Royal Society of Chemistry's building in London
The Royal Society of Chemistry’s building in London

Wikimedia UK is to collaborate with the esteemed Royal Society of Chemistry this March for Wikipedia training session and editathon.

The Royal Society of Chemistry is a learned society and professional body for chemical scientists. With 48,000 members and a knowledge business that spans the globe, the RSC is a not-for-profit organisation with 170 years of history. Its mission it to work to shape the future of the chemical sciences – for the benefit of science and humanity.

As a result of a discussion between John Cummings, our recent Wikimedian-in-Residence at the Natural History Museum and Science Museum, and staff members of the Royal Society of Chemistry, this collaborative event between the Society and WMUK will take place on Friday 28 March 2014 at Burlington House, the London home of the Royal Society of Chemistry.

The event will involve basic Wikipedia training for beginners, followed by an editing session focused on improving articles related to the chemical sciences and notable scientists.

This free event is open to the public but places are limited. To apply for a free space at the event please email the Society with your name, Society membership number (if applicable), why you are interested in the workshop and, most importantly, what would you like to get out of the day. The registration process closes on Sunday 16 February.

Vote for your picture of the year…

Gottweig Abbey Library, Austria. This photo is one of the nominees in the contest.

This post was written by Stuart Prior, Wikimania Liaison

Once again, it’s time for Wikimedia Commons’ Picture of the Year. This really does showcase the quality of photographers we have out there contributing to the community, and there’s a lovely diversity in the work displayed. Not to forgot those adding illustrations, maps and diagrams (I love the maps, personally).

It’s fun to have these competitions, but I think it’s important not to understate the value and importance of being able to collect and share images like this freely, given the situation that in many countries there is still no true Freedom of Panorama. Fortunately in the UK we have a lot of latitude as photographers, but there is a long way to go in terms of expanding these freedoms in other countries and regions.

Given this context, I feel as though I should be voting for them all, and it is another thing that makes it harder to choose. Also, I am never sure whether I am judging this based on how good I think the picture is, or how much I like the content?

As it is, the images in the Interiors & Details category are among my favourites, and I hope to see see something from there reach the finals. Place your own votes now!

A big thanks to those who have submitted, and good luck to all.

Voting for round one finishes tonight. Round two will begin soon after.