User contributions for King4057
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
3 July 2012
- 03:5403:54, 3 July 2012 diff hist −112 Draft best practice guidelines for PR →Primary Thesis: Minor language trimming
- 03:5303:53, 3 July 2012 diff hist +219 Draft best practice guidelines for PR Balancing out a bit with the PR POV
2 July 2012
- 01:1201:12, 2 July 2012 diff hist −2,377 Draft best practice guidelines for PR trimming
- 01:0301:03, 2 July 2012 diff hist −8 Draft best practice guidelines for PR →A Step-by-Step Guide: How to improve articles
- 01:0201:02, 2 July 2012 diff hist −1,270 Draft best practice guidelines for PR →A Step-by-Step Guide: How to improve articles: Some more trimming of editorializing and re-shifting to clear instructions
- 00:5400:54, 2 July 2012 diff hist −868 Draft best practice guidelines for PR More trimming and switching the order
- 00:5000:50, 2 July 2012 diff hist +1 Draft best practice guidelines for PR →Primary Thesis
- 00:4900:49, 2 July 2012 diff hist −90 Draft best practice guidelines for PR Some minor slimming and general editorial. Wasn't signed in before, but the IP address is me.
30 June 2012
- 16:4816:48, 30 June 2012 diff hist +47 Draft best practice guidelines for PR →Objective: Should clarify whos guidelines they are
- 16:3716:37, 30 June 2012 diff hist +3,629 N User:King4057 Created page with "A copy/paste of my user profile at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:King4057 King4057] on the English encyclopedia. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:King4057/EthicalWiki T..." current
- 16:3616:36, 30 June 2012 diff hist +500 Talk:Draft best practice guidelines for PR →Direct editing
- 16:3016:30, 30 June 2012 diff hist −760 Draft best practice guidelines for PR Improving structure by putting related topics next to each other and some condensing
- 16:2516:25, 30 June 2012 diff hist −28 Draft best practice guidelines for PR →References: Since it doesn't look like there are any references
- 16:2416:24, 30 June 2012 diff hist −286 Draft best practice guidelines for PR →Practical approaches: I think it's probably highly debateable if Wikipedia is a social media site. It's an online encyclopedia.
- 16:2316:23, 30 June 2012 diff hist −418 Draft best practice guidelines for PR →The free encyclopedia that anyone can edit?
- 16:1916:19, 30 June 2012 diff hist −998 Draft best practice guidelines for PR General editorial, condensing, removing editorializing, etc.
- 16:1416:14, 30 June 2012 diff hist +15 Draft best practice guidelines for PR →Objective
- 16:1416:14, 30 June 2012 diff hist −335 Draft best practice guidelines for PR →"Dark arts" on Wikipedia: Re-writing in a more neutral and internationally relevant way, considering these are being used around the globe.
- 16:0716:07, 30 June 2012 diff hist −2 Draft best practice guidelines for PR →Objective
- 16:0716:07, 30 June 2012 diff hist +2 Draft best practice guidelines for PR Moving Version history to the bottom so we can dive right into the advice
- 16:0616:06, 30 June 2012 diff hist +5 Draft best practice guidelines for PR →Background
- 16:0616:06, 30 June 2012 diff hist −260 Draft best practice guidelines for PR →Objective: Some more trimming and editorial
- 16:0416:04, 30 June 2012 diff hist −278 Draft best practice guidelines for PR I'm not sure what that sentence intended to say, but I'm not sure it's true either, also improving structure
- 16:0316:03, 30 June 2012 diff hist −602 Draft best practice guidelines for PR Not sure the value of defining PR, especially if the target audience is PR professionals
- 16:0116:01, 30 June 2012 diff hist +1 Draft best practice guidelines for PR No edit summary