Talk:Meetings/2009-07-21/Agenda

Initiatives

Per Initiatives#Timeline, this meeting should confirm for each of the three initiatives a "list of involved members [and] leader". The first can be acheived by giving an action from the meeting but the second needs to be decided at the meeting.

I suggest we add content access to the discussion - although we haven't adopted it as one of the "three", we still need to complete by June 2010 or else we'll have to give the money back.

Also I suggest we drop "proposals" from the agenda unless there is a specific proposal that someone wants to bring up. Let's keep the focus on these four or else we'll get distracted. AndrewRT 17:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

The idea behind discussing the proposals was to keep them ticking over for when we feel that they can get started (e.g. if sufficient volunteers are available), and to raise any concerns/questions about them. So long as we do that on-wiki, though, they probably don't need to be discussed in the board meeting. Mike Peel 22:57, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Attendence

Should we discuss Meetings/Attendance? AndrewRT 20:54, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

In what way? Mike Peel 20:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)